Youssef Zagdoud

Age today16y 8mBorn2010 Height 186 cm 6'1" PositionPG NationalityBelgium Plays as Slashing GuardInterior Scorer Β· Point-of-Attack Defender Signed Not checked NCAA 5 seasonsenrol by 2029-30 Last game 2026-08-15 84 days ago Sample 543β€² Β· 18 GP Teams in windowBelgium / Vilvoorde
91Prospect score
#3 of 253 born 2010
Sign in to save or compare
Read scouted ? Read

8 of 16 rules fired.

The findings below come from a deterministic rule engine β€” every number is a value in the mart, cited beneath the sentence it supports.

This player's opening paragraph is different. He has 1 published scouting report (Scoutbasketball), and the paragraph is written from them rather than from a rule. It is the only generated prose on this page. Findings marked " are also a scout's opinion, not a measurement, and carry their outlet and date instead of a mart path. The originals are linked under "What the scouts wrote" below β€” read them before you rely on the summary.

Rule findings are never removed to agree with a scout. Where the two point opposite ways, the finding says so.

Zagdoud's retrieved file is production, and the production is loud. A 6'1" Belgian point guard born 30 January 2010, he averaged 22.1 points per game with a 20.4 efficiency rating at the FIBA U16 EuroBasket 2026, and 19.6 points, 2.2 rebounds and 5.2 assists in 27.6 minutes on 49.3% shooting across a five-game sample.

Nothing describing how he generates that β€” his handle, his shot, his defence β€” was retrieved.

Written from 1 published report (Scoutbasketball) β€” not from the model. The score and every finding beside it are unaffected.

Strengths (4)
+ Disruptive on the ball β€” 6.8 steals per 40.mart.prospect.stl40 = 6.85
+ Creates for others β€” 7.2 assists per 40.mart.prospect.ast40 = 7.15
" 22.1 points per game with a 20.4 efficiency rating at FIBA U16 EuroBasket 2026.Scoutbasketball; FIBA
" 19.6 points and 5.2 assists in 27.6 minutes on 49.3% shooting across a five-game sample.Scoutbasketball
Weaknesses (2)
βˆ’ Shoots often and misses: 21.5% on 7.9 threes per 40.mart.prospect.fg3_pct = 21.5, fg3a40 = 7.88
βˆ’ Everything on record is at youth level; his strongest competition is FIBA U16 EuroBasket Division A (Level Index 45), so the projection carries more uncertainty than his numbers suggest.mart.prospect.top_level = 45.06
Read this with care (1)
!His competitions carry birth dates for only 50% of players, so his cohort comparison is against an incomplete field.mart.prospect.comp_dob_coverage = 50.2
Context (4)
Β· Reads statistically as a slashing guard β€” listed PG, 186 cm (6'1").mart.prospect.primary_role = 'Slashing Guard', height_cm = 186
Β· Seen across 3 competitions in the window (fiba-u16-euro-a, int-eybl-u16, int-eybl-u20) β€” his cross-level observations are also what the league-strength model is fitted on.mart.prospect.n_competitions = 3
Β· No usable prior record to measure improvement against β€” normal for a player this young. Nothing is assumed in either direction: trajectory does not enter the score.mart.prospect.trajectory_known = false
" No qualitative scouting was retrieved β€” the single passage is box-score production with no description of how he generates it. Treat this as a pointer to go and watch him, not an evaluation.app.scout_report: 1 report, non-evaluative
Score breakdown ? Score breakdown

Every number here is a percentile within the 2010 cohort β€” 253 players who cleared the sample floor. 50 is the middle of his own age group, not of basketball.

Weighted 32 / 24 / 16 / 12 β€” Production, Level, Age vs level, Skill markers. Physical and Confidence scale the whole score instead, by up to 10% and 6%; they can lower it, never raise it. Move the weights on the board β†’

Production ? Production

How much he produced, once you strip out how easy his competition was and how old he is. Points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks in one number, per 40 minutes, then shrunk toward the average if we have seen little of him.

For him: age + level adjusted.

100
Level ? Level

The best competition he has genuinely held a role in β€” weighted by how big that role was, plus a little credit for the strongest competition he has appeared in at all.

For him: strongest competition with a reliable sample.

86
Age vs level ? Age vs level

How young he is for the company he keeps. Months younger than the typical regular where he has held a real role, plus a little credit for the gap at the strongest competition he has appeared in at all β€” the same shape as Level, because reaching an ACB floor at seventeen counts even for two minutes.

For him: 24 months younger.

89
Skill markers ? Skill markers

True shooting, three-point volume x accuracy, assist-to-turnover, free-throw rate, and steals plus blocks β€” the markers that tend to survive a move up a level. Ranked against others in his position group and birth year.

For him: TS Β· 3P volΓ—acc Β· A/TO Β· FTr.

85
Physical ? Physical

His height as a percentile among players of the same POSITION and age β€” 206 cm is average for a centre and exceptional for a wing. It can only subtract, and only below the median: average height for your position costs nothing, and the compression grows to at most 10% for the genuinely undersized.

For him: within PG his age.

66
Confidence ? Confidence

How much of him we have actually seen β€” minutes, share of his team's games, and how many separate competitions. This is a statement about our data, not a judgement about the player.

For him: how much we have seen β€” 543β€² Β· 18 GP Β· estimated profile.

92
Rate profile ? Rate profile

Each family is his level- and age-adjusted rate, percentiled against every player born in 2010 who cleared the sample floor β€” the same 253 players the score breakdown uses.

Scoring Rebounding Playmaking Defence Efficiency Usage
Scoring 98
Rebounding 31
Playmaking 92
Defence 98
Efficiency 72
Usage 99
Career Adj: his 37.5 vs a 2010 median of 27.1 ? Career

One row per competition-season, because "how good is he" is only answerable per level.

Lvl is the fitted Level Index band. Adj is his composite production translated to the FIBA youth Division A baseline at age 20 β€” the number that makes a Lithuanian U18 line and an ACB line comparable.

Reading Adj. A per-40 composite (points + 0.7Β·rebounds + assists + steals + blocks βˆ’ 0.7Β·turnovers) after the competition effect and the age effect have been removed, so two rows compare directly however far apart their levels are. For scale, the median among ranked 2010-born players is 27.1; his own window figure is 37.5 after sample shrinkage.

Game log ↓
Season Competition LvlAdj Obs TeamAgeGPMINMPG PPGRPG APG PTS/40REB/40AST/40STLBLKTOV TS%3P%3PA/40USGOREB%DREB% +/βˆ’
2026 FIBA U16 EuroBasket Division A U16 4 43.5 41.8 Belgium 16.5 7 212 30.3 22.1 3.1 5.4 29.2 4.2 7.2 5.7 0.4 5.1 54.6 16.1 5.8 35.0 3.1 9.0 -8.9
2025-2026 EYBL U20 U20 5 43.6 41.0 Vilvoorde 16.0 4 118 29.5 17.0 5.8 7.3 23.1 7.8 9.8 5.8 0.0 4.4 46.6 18.2 11.2 32.3 4.6 16.8 0.0
2025-2026 EYBL U16 U16 5 49.9 57.0 Vilvoorde 15.8 7 213 30.4 29.4 6.3 4.3 38.7 8.3 5.6 8.6 0.9 3.8 63.2 27.9 8.1 36.7 8.0 15.0 0.0
Game log 18 of 18 shown ? Game log

Every game he played, newest first β€” the window and everything before it.

Age is his exact age that day, not his age this season. St marks a start; a p beside it means the source rows for that game do not sum to the reported score.

DateCompTeam OpponentResultAgeMINPTS FG3PFTORDRREB ASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/βˆ’St
2026-08-15 fiba-u16-euro-a Belgium @ Israel 68–85 16.54 3320 4/141/511/14 325 641 41 -19 ●
2026-08-14 fiba-u16-euro-a Belgium Slovenia 85–82 16.54 3737 16/310/55/7 246 680 01 4 ●
2026-08-12 fiba-u16-euro-a Belgium @ Czech-Republic 88–93 16.53 4035 14/241/66/11 000 830 74 -1 ●
2026-08-11 fiba-u16-euro-a Belgium @ Spain 60–97 16.53 1915 5/121/34/4 112 230 51 -12 ●
2026-08-09 fiba-u16-euro-a Belgium @ Slovenia 67–80 16.52 3220 9/200/62/3 055 771 42 -10 ●
2026-08-08 fiba-u16-euro-a Belgium France 61–85 16.52 2715 5/92/33/4 011 540 33 -1 ●
2026-08-07 fiba-u16-euro-a Belgium @ Germany 60–82 16.52 2413 4/100/35/7 033 410 43 -23 ●
2026-02-15 int-eybl-u20 Vilvoorde @ MS Academy 75–101 16.04 2417 7/160/53/3 055 620 40 0 ●
2026-02-14 int-eybl-u20 Vilvoorde Rustavi 65–95 16.04 3220 7/173/93/4 156 330 43 0 ●
2026-02-13 int-eybl-u20 Vilvoorde Honka 66–63 16.04 2916 4/141/77/7 044 1240 24 0 ●
2026-02-13 int-eybl-u20 Vilvoorde @ IBF 76–65 16.04 3315 5/182/123/4 448 880 33 0 ●
2026-01-11 int-eybl-u16 Vilvoorde Inter B. 88–55 15.95 2829 13/211/42/6 235 341 21 0 ●
2026-01-10 int-eybl-u16 Vilvoorde Gdynia 76–68 15.95 267 3/91/50/0 077 341 31 0 ●
2026-01-08 int-eybl-u16 Vilvoorde @ Olomouc 67–86 15.94 2425 10/132/53/5 044 360 20 0 ●
2025-11-02 int-eybl-u16 Vilvoorde @ Sokol Prazsky 85–81 15.76 4444 18/343/125/8 314 4131 32 0 ●
2025-11-01 int-eybl-u16 Vilvoorde Firenze 97–68 15.75 3141 17/273/64/9 5712 352 72 0 ●
2025-10-31 int-eybl-u16 Vilvoorde @ Rae/Kiili 85–79 15.75 2828 11/180/56/8 033 630 22 0 ●
2025-10-30 int-eybl-u16 Vilvoorde Telavi 90–78 15.75 3232 12/222/66/7 549 8110 12 0 ●
Development standing in the 2010 cohort ? Development

Each point is his level- and age-adjusted production over the twelve months ending that quarter, placed against everyone born in 2010 who also had 150+ minutes in their own trailing year. 100 is the top of his age group.

A rising line is a player pulling away from his own age group; a flat one at a higher level is still progress.

It is built from the same fitted coefficients as the Prospect Score's largest component, applied to the games played up to each quarter β€” not a separate model, and not a reconstruction of the Score itself, which exists only for today.

Recent form is a rolling 10-game composite per 40 over his last games β€” raw output, not translated, because form is about what he is doing now.

0 25 50 75 100 2026 Q1 β€” 99 Β· adj 47.6 Β· #2 of 77 Β· 331β€²/11 in the trailing year 2026 Q1 Q2 β€” 100 Β· adj 47.6 Β· #1 of 40 Β· 331β€²/11 in the trailing year Q2 2026 Q3 β€” 99 Β· adj 46.0 Β· #2 of 81 Β· 543β€²/18 in the trailing year 2026 Q3
SeasonLevelAdj StandingRankSample
2025-2026 4 46.0 98 #4/154 543β€²/18
Recent form rolling 10 games, raw per 40
2025-10-30 last 18 games Β· latest 41.1 2026-08-15
Level ladder strongest first ? Level ladder

Every competition he has played a reliable sample in, strongest first. The bar is how strong the competition is β€” its Level Index, 0 to 100 β€” not how much he played; his total minutes there are on the right.

Moving up this ladder while holding production is the trajectory signal.

Competition levelMinutes
4 FIBA U16 EuroBasket Division A Β· 45 212β€²
5 EYBL U20 Β· 38 118β€²
5 EYBL U16 Β· 14 213β€²
πŸ”’ Comparable players

Who he looked like at the same age, and who plays like him now. For subscribers.

Sign in See plans