Nikola Karalic

Age today18y 0mBorn2008 Height 201 cm 6'7" PositionSG/SF NationalitySerbia Plays as Balanced ContributorDownhill / Foul Drawer Signed Not checked NCAA 5 seasonsenrol by 2028-29 Last game 2026-08-02 97 days ago Sample 2,232′ · 92 GP Teams in windowMega BG / Mega SM / Mega Super / OKK Beograd / Serbia
94Prospect score
#4 of 790 born 2008
Sign in to save or compare
Read scouted ? Read

10 of 16 rules fired.

The findings below come from a deterministic rule engine — every number is a value in the mart, cited beneath the sentence it supports.

This player's opening paragraph is different. He has 1 published scouting report (Eurohopes), and the paragraph is written from them rather than from a rule. It is the only generated prose on this page. Findings marked " are also a scout's opinion, not a measurement, and carry their outlet and date instead of a mart path. The originals are linked under "What the scouts wrote" below — read them before you rely on the summary.

Rule findings are never removed to agree with a scout. Where the two point opposite ways, the finding says so.

Karalic's retrieved file contains no individual evaluation. The single passage is team-level ANGT context: Mega returning for another season with multiple names to watch, after finishing sixth at the Torneig de l'Hospitalet in December. He is a 6'8" swingman born 20 September 2008 at OKK Beograd.

Nothing describing his game was retrieved.

Written from 1 published report (Eurohopes) — not from the model. The score and every finding beside it are unaffected.

Strengths (4)
+ Playing 7.8 years younger than the typical regular at his level — the strongest age-relative signal in the model.mart.prospect.months_younger_than_level = 93.4
+ Improving and climbing at the same time: adjusted production up 4.1 while his level rose 31 points on the Level Index. Holding production while moving up is a stronger signal than improving at the same tier.mart.prospect.delta_composite = 4.061, delta_level = 30.6
+ Size is a genuine advantage — 201 cm (6'7"), 92th percentile among wings his age.mart.prospect.height_cm = 201, physical_pct = 91.6
+ Already tested at Kosarkaska Liga Srbije (Level Index 77) — senior basketball, not a youth bracket.mart.prospect.top_level = 76.64
Weaknesses (1)
− Range is not there yet — 29.7% from three on 293 attempts.mart.prospect.fg3_pct = 29.7, fg3a = 293
Read this with care (2)
!At least one of his competitions has too few cross-level links for a confident strength coefficient, so his level adjustment is weaker evidence than the number implies.mart.prospect.any_level_low_confidence = true
!His competitions carry birth dates for only 79% of players, so his cohort comparison is against an incomplete field.mart.prospect.comp_dob_coverage = 79.3
Context (4)
· Reads statistically as a balanced contributor — listed SG/SF, 201 cm (6'7").mart.prospect.primary_role = 'Balanced Contributor', height_cm = 201
· Seen across 6 competitions in the window (fiba-u16-euro-a, fiba-u18-euro-a, int-aba-u19, int-angt, rs-jls, rs-kls) — his cross-level observations are also what the league-strength model is fitted on.mart.prospect.n_competitions = 6
· Well sampled: 2232 minutes over 92 games.mart.prospect.minutes = 2232
" No individual scouting retrieved — the single passage is team-level ANGT context that names him without evaluating him.app.scout_report: 1 report, non-evaluative
Score breakdown ? Score breakdown

Every number here is a percentile within the 2008 cohort — 790 players who cleared the sample floor. 50 is the middle of his own age group, not of basketball.

Weighted 32 / 24 / 16 / 12 — Production, Level, Age vs level, Skill markers. Physical and Confidence scale the whole score instead, by up to 10% and 6%; they can lower it, never raise it. Move the weights on the board →

Production ? Production

How much he produced, once you strip out how easy his competition was and how old he is. Points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks in one number, per 40 minutes, then shrunk toward the average if we have seen little of him.

For him: age + level adjusted.

91
Level ? Level

The best competition he has genuinely held a role in — weighted by how big that role was, plus a little credit for the strongest competition he has appeared in at all.

For him: strongest competition with a reliable sample · coefficient low-confidence.

99
Age vs level ? Age vs level

How young he is for the company he keeps. Months younger than the typical regular where he has held a real role, plus a little credit for the gap at the strongest competition he has appeared in at all — the same shape as Level, because reaching an ACB floor at seventeen counts even for two minutes.

For him: 93 months younger.

95
Skill markers ? Skill markers

True shooting, three-point volume x accuracy, assist-to-turnover, free-throw rate, and steals plus blocks — the markers that tend to survive a move up a level. Ranked against others in his position group and birth year.

For him: TS · 3P vol×acc · A/TO · FTr.

93
Physical ? Physical

His height as a percentile among players of the same POSITION and age — 206 cm is average for a centre and exceptional for a wing. It can only subtract, and only below the median: average height for your position costs nothing, and the compression grows to at most 10% for the genuinely undersized.

For him: within SG/SF his age.

92
Confidence ? Confidence

How much of him we have actually seen — minutes, share of his team's games, and how many separate competitions. This is a statement about our data, not a judgement about the player.

For him: how much we have seen — 2,232′ · 92 GP · estimated profile.

95
Rate profile ? Rate profile

Each family is his level- and age-adjusted rate, percentiled against every player born in 2008 who cleared the sample floor — the same 790 players the score breakdown uses.

Scoring Rebounding Playmaking Defence Efficiency Usage
Scoring 83
Rebounding 66
Playmaking 74
Defence 65
Efficiency 81
Usage 64
Career Adj: his 29.1 vs a 2008 median of 24.1 ? Career

One row per competition-season, because "how good is he" is only answerable per level.

Lvl is the fitted Level Index band. Adj is his composite production translated to the FIBA youth Division A baseline at age 20 — the number that makes a Lithuanian U18 line and an ACB line comparable.

Reading Adj. A per-40 composite (points + 0.7·rebounds + assists + steals + blocks − 0.7·turnovers) after the competition effect and the age effect have been removed, so two rows compare directly however far apart their levels are. For scale, the median among ranked 2008-born players is 24.1; his own window figure is 29.1 after sample shrinkage.

Game log ↓
Season Competition LvlAdj Obs TeamAgeGPMINMPG PPGRPG APG PTS/40REB/40AST/40STLBLKTOV TS%3P%3PA/40USGOREB%DREB% +/−
2026 FIBA U18 EuroBasket Division A U18 3 30.6 27.5 Serbia 17.9 7 178 25.4 9.7 5.0 3.0 15.3 7.9 4.7 2.2 1.1 2.0 51.2 25.0 3.6 18.7 7.2 13.7 0.1
2025-2026 Adidas Next Generation Tournament U18 4 31.3 29.6 Mega Super 17.4 4 111 27.8 14.3 5.5 2.3 20.5 7.9 3.2 1.1 0.7 2.2 53.6 26.7 5.4 23.2 11.9 10.8 0.0
2025-2026 Kosarkaska Liga Srbije 2 29.9 20.0 OKK Beograd 17.3 22 632 28.7 9.5 4.0 1.9 13.2 5.5 2.7 1.1 0.4 1.6 53.5 29.5 5.6 14.9 6.1 10.3 6.7
2025-2026 ABA League U19 U19 4 38.3 36.6 Mega SM 17.4 5 113 22.6 13.6 6.8 1.4 24.1 12.0 2.5 2.5 0.3 1.8 67.5 36.4 3.9 19.1 8.2 21.1 2.6
2025-2026 Juniorska Liga Srbije U19 4 35.7 36.6 Mega SM 17.6 8 189 23.6 13.9 5.8 2.6 23.5 9.7 4.4 3.2 0.6 2.8 56.9 9.5 4.4 24.6 9.8 18.5 11.5
2024-2025 Adidas Next Generation Tournament U18 4 29.1 22.5 Mega BG 16.4 7 185 26.4 10.3 2.4 1.7 15.6 3.7 2.6 2.2 0.9 1.7 57.5 23.5 3.7 16.7 2.4 7.2 0.0
2023-2024 Adidas Next Generation Tournament U18 4 21.1 13.2 Mega BG 15.5 7 76 10.9 2.1 0.9 0.9 7.9 3.2 3.2 2.1 0.0 3.2 38.2 33.3 4.7 14.9 0.0 8.5 0.0
2024-2025 ABA League U19 U19 4 45.3 38.3 Mega SM 16.3 5 78 15.6 11.0 2.6 1.2 28.2 6.7 3.1 2.0 1.0 1.0 75.8 56.3 8.2 19.9 11.0 8.1 2.0
2024-2025 Juniorska Liga Srbije U19 4 31.8 27.7 Mega SM 16.3 20 486 24.3 11.4 4.0 2.1 18.8 6.6 3.4 2.1 0.3 2.1 55.8 29.1 7.1 20.5 2.6 15.7 8.0
2024 FIBA U16 EuroBasket Division A U16 4 29.3 24.2 Serbia 15.9 7 184 26.3 8.6 4.6 3.4 13.0 7.0 5.2 1.7 0.9 2.2 52.1 42.9 3.0 16.8 6.1 11.3 9.4
2023-2024 Juniorska Liga Srbije U19 4 27.5 20.3 Mega SM 15.4 24 462 19.3 6.0 2.5 2.1 12.6 5.1 4.3 1.3 0.4 2.7 55.5 32.8 5.3 15.1 3.9 10.0 11.7
2023-2024 ABA League U19 U19 4 — — Mega SM 15.2 2 12 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.7 6.7 6.7 3.3 0.0 3.3 33.3 0.0 6.7 13.7 11.4 8.0 0.0
Game log 25 of 118 shown ? Game log

Every game he played, newest first — the window and everything before it.

Age is his exact age that day, not his age this season. St marks a start; a p beside it means the source rows for that game do not sum to the reported score.

DateCompTeam OpponentResultAgeMINPTS FG3PFTORDRREB ASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/−St
2026-08-02 fiba-u18-euro-a Serbia Estonia 77–67 17.86 140 0/10/00/2 101 001 22 -13 ●
2026-08-01 fiba-u18-euro-a Serbia @ Denmark 70–54 17.86 3120 6/101/37/10 3811 341 40 18 ●
2026-07-30 fiba-u18-euro-a Serbia Bulgaria 89–62 17.86 206 3/40/10/0 123 511 22 1 ●
2026-07-29 fiba-u18-euro-a Serbia Greece 77–78 17.85 3817 5/153/84/6 134 620 03 1 ●
2026-07-27 fiba-u18-euro-a Serbia Denmark 74–66 17.85 269 3/100/23/4 358 301 04 -6 ●
2026-07-26 fiba-u18-euro-a Serbia Turkey 53–57 17.85 295 2/70/11/2 224 021 13 -6
2026-07-25 fiba-u18-euro-a Serbia @ Slovakia 94–70 17.84 2011 3/40/15/11 224 410 02 6 ●
2026-05-10 rs-jls Mega SM Dynamic BG 86–75 17.63 3915 4/140/67/9 279 331 43 10 ●
2026-05-09 rs-jls Mega SM Partizan BG 90–72 17.63 3326 7/190/612/12 3710 331 12 26 ●
2026-05-08 rs-jls Mega SM Borac CA 89–60 17.63 2118 6/101/35/7 123 321 10 23 ●
2026-04-26 rs-jls Mega SM Konstantin Nis 119–62 17.60 84 2/30/00/0 112 110 00 20 ●
2026-04-23 int-aba-u19 Mega SM Crvena zvezda 120–78 17.59 2816 5/130/56/8 1910 211 22 5 ●
2026-04-22 int-aba-u19 Mega SM Cedevita Ol 94–82 17.59 1612 4/71/23/3 123 110 22 2
2026-04-21 int-aba-u19 Mega SM Partizan BG 109–65 17.58 1812 4/82/32/3 145 310 00 2
2026-04-19 rs-jls Mega SM Dynamic BG 96–67 17.58 99 4/60/11/1 123 100 11 8
2026-04-17 rs-jls Mega SM @ Crvena zvezda 78–77 17.57 2615 5/121/34/6 279 230 22 -13 ●
2026-04-11 rs-kls OKK Beograd @ Vrsac 103–94 17.56 2816 6/101/23/4 066 020 03 19 ●
2026-04-04 rs-kls OKK Beograd Radnicki KG 108–97 17.54 2712 4/71/33/3 011 210 13 12 ●
2026-03-29 rs-kls OKK Beograd @ BKK Radnicki 103–106 17.52 228 3/70/32/2 213 100 13 6 ●
2026-03-14 rs-kls OKK Beograd @ Joker S. 115–85 17.48 2315 5/93/62/2 112 100 03 13 ●
2026-03-09 rs-kls OKK Beograd Dynamic VP 112–113 17.47 258 3/61/31/5 325 110 12 9 ●
2026-02-28 rs-kls OKK Beograd @ Sloboda U. 67–89 17.44 290 0/40/30/0 123 000 12 -3 ●
2026-02-22 rs-jls Mega SM @ Dynamic BG 99–94 17.42 2811 4/40/03/5 044 310 03 3 ●
2026-02-08 int-angt Mega Super @ Cedevita 73–82 17.39 346 3/140/40/2 538 310 11 0 ●
2026-02-07 int-angt Mega Super ASVEL U18 92–82 17.38 3521 7/132/55/6 123 411 13 0 ●
Development standing in the 2008 cohort ? Development

Each point is his level- and age-adjusted production over the twelve months ending that quarter, placed against everyone born in 2008 who also had 150+ minutes in their own trailing year. 100 is the top of his age group.

A rising line is a player pulling away from his own age group; a flat one at a higher level is still progress.

It is built from the same fitted coefficients as the Prospect Score's largest component, applied to the games played up to each quarter — not a separate model, and not a reconstruction of the Score itself, which exists only for today.

Recent form is a rolling 10-game composite per 40 over his last games — raw output, not translated, because form is about what he is doing now.

0 25 50 75 100 2024 Q1 — 63 · adj 26.4 · #83 of 220 · 448′/23 in the trailing year 2024 Q1 Q2 — 63 · adj 26.6 · #78 of 211 · 538′/31 in the trailing year Q2 2024 Q3 — 56 · adj 27.3 · #104 of 233 · 722′/38 in the trailing year 2024 Q3 Q4 — 74 · adj 30.6 · #80 of 300 · 1,001′/46 in the trailing year Q4 2025 Q1 — 85 · adj 32.5 · #55 of 356 · 824′/39 in the trailing year 2025 Q1 Q2 — 80 · adj 31.9 · #59 of 299 · 933′/39 in the trailing year Q2 2025 Q3 — 84 · adj 32.6 · #43 of 255 · 749′/32 in the trailing year 2025 Q3 Q4 — 66 · adj 28.8 · #99 of 293 · 647′/24 in the trailing year Q4 2026 Q1 — 70 · adj 28.7 · #109 of 357 · 871′/30 in the trailing year 2026 Q1 Q2 — 84 · adj 32.0 · #48 of 289 · 1,045′/39 in the trailing year Q2 2026 Q3 — 76 · adj 31.8 · #31 of 127 · 1,223′/46 in the trailing year 2026 Q3
SeasonLevelAdj StandingRankSample
2025-2026 2 31.8 85 #63/413 1,223′/46
2024-2025 4 32.6 85 #55/361 749′/32
2023-2024 4 27.3 61 #114/292 722′/38
Recent form rolling 10 games, raw per 40
2026-02-07 last 25 games · latest 31.4 2026-08-02
Level ladder strongest first ? Level ladder

Every competition he has played a reliable sample in, strongest first. The bar is how strong the competition is — its Level Index, 0 to 100 — not how much he played; his total minutes there are on the right.

Moving up this ladder while holding production is the trajectory signal.

Competition levelMinutes
2 Kosarkaska Liga Srbije · 77 632′
3 FIBA U18 EuroBasket Division A · 64 178′
4 Adidas Next Generation Tournament · 56 372′
4 ABA League U19 · 51 191′
4 Juniorska Liga Srbije · 46 1,137′
4 FIBA U16 EuroBasket Division A · 45 184′
🔒 Comparable players

Who he looked like at the same age, and who plays like him now. For subscribers.

Sign in See plans