Alonso Galindo

Age today16y 0mBorn2010 Height not recorded Position— NationalitySpain Plays as Unclassified Signed Not checked NCAA 5 seasonsenrol by 2030-31 Last game 2026-04-06 7 months ago Sample 400′ · 22 GP Teams in windowUnicaja U22

90Prospect score

#5 of 253 born 2010

Read ? Read

5 of 16 rules fired.

The findings below come from a deterministic rule engine — every number is a value in the mart, cited beneath the sentence it supports.

Nothing here is written by a language model.

About 3.3 years younger than the median regular of the competitions he played in.

Disruptive on the ball — 2.7 steals per 40.

Strengths (2)

+ About 3.3 years younger than the median regular of the competitions he played in.mart.prospect.months_younger_than_level = 39.8

+ Disruptive on the ball — 2.7 steals per 40.mart.prospect.stl40 = 2.7

Weaknesses (0)

No rule fired at a weakness threshold.

Read this with care (2)

!No height on record, so the physical component is imputed at the cohort midpoint and the score should be read with that in mind.mart.prospect.height_cm IS NULL

!Three-point sample is too small to judge: 35 attempts.mart.prospect.fg3a = 35

Context (1)

· No usable prior record to measure improvement against — normal for a player this young. Nothing is assumed in either direction: trajectory does not enter the score.mart.prospect.trajectory_known = false

Score breakdown ? Score breakdown

Every number here is a percentile within the 2010 cohort — 253 players who cleared the sample floor. 50 is the middle of his own age group, not of basketball.

Weighted 32 / 24 / 16 / 12 — Production, Level, Age vs level, Skill markers. Physical and Confidence scale the whole score instead, by up to 10% and 6%; they can lower it, never raise it. Move the weights on the board →

Production ? Production

How much he produced, once you strip out how easy his competition was and how old he is. Points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks in one number, per 40 minutes, then shrunk toward the average if we have seen little of him.

For him: age + level adjusted.

100

Level ? Level

The best competition he has genuinely held a role in — weighted by how big that role was, plus a little credit for the strongest competition he has appeared in at all.

For him: strongest competition with a reliable sample.

Age vs level ? Age vs level

How young he is for the company he keeps. Months younger than the typical regular where he has held a real role, plus a little credit for the gap at the strongest competition he has appeared in at all — the same shape as Level, because reaching an ACB floor at seventeen counts even for two minutes.

For him: 40 months younger.

Skill markers ? Skill markers

True shooting, three-point volume x accuracy, assist-to-turnover, free-throw rate, and steals plus blocks — the markers that tend to survive a move up a level. Ranked against others in his position group and birth year.

For him: TS · 3P vol×acc · A/TO · FTr.

Physical ? Physical

His height as a percentile among players of the same POSITION and age — 206 cm is average for a centre and exceptional for a wing. It can only subtract, and only below the median: average height for your position costs nothing, and the compression grows to at most 10% for the genuinely undersized.

For him: height imputed.

Confidence ? Confidence

How much of him we have actually seen — minutes, share of his team's games, and how many separate competitions. This is a statement about our data, not a judgement about the player.

For him: how much we have seen — 400′ · 22 GP · estimated profile.

Rate profile ? Rate profile

Each family is his level- and age-adjusted rate, percentiled against every player born in 2010 who cleared the sample floor — the same 253 players the score breakdown uses.

Scoring 95

Rebounding 19

Playmaking 87

Defence 79

Efficiency 58

Usage 97

Career Adj: his 31.2 vs a 2010 median of 27.1 ? Career

One row per competition-season, because "how good is he" is only answerable per level.

Lvl is the fitted Level Index band. Adj is his composite production translated to the FIBA youth Division A baseline at age 20 — the number that makes a Lithuanian U18 line and an ACB line comparable.

Reading Adj. A per-40 composite (points + 0.7·rebounds + assists + steals + blocks − 0.7·turnovers) after the competition effect and the age effect have been removed, so two rows compare directly however far apart their levels are. For scale, the median among ranked 2010-born players is 27.1; his own window figure is 31.2 after sample shrinkage.

Game log ↓

Season	Competition	Lvl	Adj	Obs	Team	Age	GP	MIN	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	PTS/40	REB/40	AST/40	STL	BLK	TOV	TS%	3P%	3PA/40	USG	OREB%	DREB%	+/−
2025-2026	Liga U22 U22	3	37.1	22.2	Unicaja U22	15.3	22	400	18.2	7.4	1.3	1.7	16.3	2.8	3.7	2.7	0.2	3.8	46.1	25.7	3.5	23.0	2.1	5.2	0.0

Game log 22 of 22 shown ? Game log

Every game he played, newest first — the window and everything before it.

Age is his exact age that day, not his age this season. St marks a start; a p beside it means the source rows for that game do not sum to the reported score.

Date	Comp	Team	Opponent	Result	Age	MIN	PTS	FG	3P	FT	OR	DR	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	St
2026-04-06	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Granada U22	76–82	15.54	12	0	0/5	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0
2026-03-27	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Girona U22	89–88	15.52	13	14	6/9	2/2	0/0	0	0	0	0	2	0	1	1
2026-03-15	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Bilbao U22	73–76	15.48	16	6	2/7	0/0	2/4	0	1	1	0	1	0	2	0	●
2026-03-13	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Murcia U22	76–74	15.48	16	0	0/4	0/1	0/0	0	1	1	3	0	0	1	3
2026-02-28	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Lleida U22	89–80	15.44	24	13	4/6	1/3	4/4	0	2	2	1	1	0	5	1
2026-02-27	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Bilbao U22	88–68	15.44	17	19	8/8	2/2	1/4	0	2	2	3	3	0	0	2
2026-02-15	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Girona U22	55–71	15.41	29	4	2/14	0/5	0/2	0	1	1	5	4	0	2	0	●
2026-01-24	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Valencia U22	75–78	15.35	13	4	2/5	0/0	0/0	0	1	1	0	0	1	2	1
2026-01-03	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Valencia U22	75–84	15.29	15	5	1/3	0/1	3/5	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	4
2025-12-27	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Manresa U22	88–85	15.27	21	13	5/11	0/1	3/4	1	2	3	2	4	0	1	2
2025-12-19	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Canarias U22	69–66	15.25	11	2	1/2	0/0	0/2	0	0	0	1	1	0	3	0
2025-12-13	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Real U22	49–86	15.23	17	8	3/7	1/3	1/2	0	1	1	1	1	0	1	1
2025-12-06	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Joventut U22	67–84	15.21	9	3	1/3	0/1	1/2	0	0	0	2	0	0	1	0
2025-12-05	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Barca U22	61–62	15.21	14	5	2/7	1/5	0/0	0	1	1	2	0	0	2	0
2025-11-28	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Zaragoza U22	78–91	15.19	17	2	0/6	0/1	2/4	1	2	3	0	2	0	1	2	●
2025-11-21	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Manresa U22	80–85	15.17	24	6	3/8	0/1	0/0	0	0	0	4	3	0	1	3
2025-11-15	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Canarias U22	87–82	15.15	20	9	4/9	0/1	1/1	1	0	1	2	2	0	2	1
2025-11-07	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Joventut U22	71–77	15.13	28	11	4/8	0/1	3/4	2	3	5	2	0	0	1	1
2025-10-31	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Zaragoza U22	68–98	15.11	22	8	4/9	0/0	0/2	0	1	1	1	1	0	4	0	●
2025-10-24	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Barca U22	70–87	15.09	16	2	1/3	0/1	0/0	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	0
2025-10-18	es-u22	Unicaja U22	Valencia U22	82–85	15.08	23	15	6/14	2/4	1/1	2	1	3	5	1	0	2	2
2025-10-10	es-u22	Unicaja U22	@ Real U22	62–105	15.06	23	14	6/10	0/2	2/2	1	0	1	1	0	0	5	1

Development standing in the 2010 cohort ? Development

Each point is his level- and age-adjusted production over the twelve months ending that quarter, placed against everyone born in 2010 who also had 150+ minutes in their own trailing year. 100 is the top of his age group.

A rising line is a player pulling away from his own age group; a flat one at a higher level is still progress.

It is built from the same fitted coefficients as the Prospect Score's largest component, applied to the games played up to each quarter — not a separate model, and not a reconstruction of the Score itself, which exists only for today.

Recent form is a rolling 10-game composite per 40 over his last games — raw output, not translated, because form is about what he is doing now.

Season	Level	Adj	Standing	Rank	Sample
2025-2026	3	37.1	86	#22/154	400′/22

Recent form rolling 10 games, raw per 40

2025-10-10 last 22 games · latest 24.4 2026-04-06

Level ladder strongest first ? Level ladder

Every competition he has played a reliable sample in, strongest first. The bar is how strong the competition is — its Level Index, 0 to 100 — not how much he played; his total minutes there are on the right.

Moving up this ladder while holding production is the trajectory signal.

Competition levelMinutes

3 Liga U22 · 65 400′

🔒 Comparable players

Who he looked like at the same age, and who plays like him now. For subscribers.